You have JavaScript disable. So you will experiment some issue: you cannot submit comments and see comments counter (isso), and you cannot sort tables by fields (Sorttable).

# What will be my next assessment function

Authors
Date of creation

## Abstract

This will be my next assessment function

The use of the arithmetic mean (Wikipedia 2016a) for assess people (in particular students results) is strongly used. But is it the best, or at least optimal, assessment function? What do I mean here? Perhaps we could assess students in diferent way, obtain a number (or letter (Wikipedia 2016b)) with different procedure. I’m not discussing here the fair of the assessment function (there are a lot of means (Wikipedia 2016c) there) but the didactic aspect of that.

This is my proposition: use additive function. If you have $$n$$ marks, $$p_1, \ldots, p_n$$, why instead of calculating arithmetic mean $$\overline{p}$$ just add them up. This has a lot of advantages:

• It’s more easy to calculate. In primary school, it’s easy for students to calculate a sum rather than a mean (it involves division)
• It captures better the sense of “league”, the sense of “marathon”: you could know, directly, how long you progress a day (“I add it up 5 points today”. “20 points left to get a C”)
• Students know better the weight of a score (exam for example) in relation to the whole course: if one activity worths 10 points, then if you passed, you get 10 points. But what is the weight of a 10 in an exam if you apply the mean? With additive assessment function, “you have what you get”
• There is an obvious equivalence between calculate arithmetic mean and just sum numbers: if each $$p_i$$ has a maximum score of $$m_i$$, then you could calculate the mean $$(p_1, \ldots, p_n) \mapsto \frac{p_1 + \ldots + p_n}{m_1 + \ldots + m_n}$$ or $$(p_1, \ldots, p_n) \mapsto p_1 + \ldots + p_n$$ (of $$m_1 + \ldots + m_n$$).

The only disavantage I know is that you have to be aware of how many test/activities students will get. Because otherwise you could not say “If you get 50 points, you will pass the course”. If students missed tests, then you/they have to re-escale (Wiktionary 2016) it (perhaps an excuse to talk about proportions ;).

By all these reasons, the additive function will be my next assessment function next course1

# References

Wikipedia. 2016a. “Arithmetic Mean.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arithmetic_mean.

———. 2016b. “Grading Systems by Country.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grading_systems_by_country.

———. 2016c. “Mean.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mean.

Wiktionary. 2016. “Rescale.” https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/rescale.

1. Right now I can’t modify the existing rules.